How Entry-Level Mini PCs Now Power Dual 4K@60Hz Displays

Update on Nov. 8, 2025, 6:22 p.m.

For the past decade, the conversation around personal computers has been dominated by a singular focus: CPU speed. We’ve been conditioned to ask, “Is it faster?” But a quiet and arguably more profound shift has been happening, one that redefines what an “entry-level” computer can do.

It’s no longer about the processor’s clock speed. For most daily tasks—web browsing, office applications, media streaming—CPUs became “fast enough” years ago. The new battleground, especially for productivity and home office use, is I/O (Input/Output). Specifically, the ability to drive high-resolution displays.

Not long ago, powering a single 4K monitor, let alone two, was the exclusive domain of expensive desktop PCs with dedicated graphics cards. Today, tiny, sub-$200 boxes can do it.

How is this possible? The answer lies not in raw processing power, but in the sophisticated integration of modern SoCs (System-on-a-Chip) and the quiet adoption of high-bandwidth ports. Let’s use a contemporary device, the KAMRUI Essenx E2 (featuring an Intel N150 processor), as a case study to dissect the technology that makes dual 4K@60Hz displays a new baseline for compact computing.

A compact, silver Mini PC, the KAMRUI Essenx E2, shown from a front-angle.

The Real 4K Challenge: It’s a Bandwidth Problem

Before we discuss the hardware, we must understand the problem: 4K@60Hz.

  • 4K refers to the resolution (3840 x 2160 pixels), which is four times the pixels of standard 1080p HD.
  • 60Hz (or 60 frames per second) refers to the refresh rate. This is the crucial part.

Many older or cheaper devices technically “support” 4K, but only at 30Hz. A 30Hz refresh rate means the screen updates 30 times per second. This is fine for watching movies (which are typically filmed at 24fps), but it’s disastrous for productivity. Your mouse cursor will feel laggy and stuttery, text will blur as you scroll, and the entire experience will feel sluggish and cheap.

To achieve a smooth, responsive 4K experience, you need 60Hz. The problem is that
4K@60Hz requires moving a massive amount of data—roughly 18 Gigabits per second (Gbps)—from the computer to the monitor, every single second.

This is purely an I/O and bandwidth challenge. Your CPU’s speed is irrelevant if the physical pipe (the port) is too small.

The Enablers: Decoding the Ports

This brings us to the back of our case study, the KAMRUI Essenx E2. Its capabilities are defined not by its N150 CPU, but by its inclusion of two specific ports: HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4.

A rear view of the KAMRUI Essenx E2, clearly showing the dual USB 3.2, dual USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDMI 2.0 ports.

  1. HDMI 2.0: This is the standard that saved 4K for productivity. Its predecessor, HDMI 1.4 (which still haunts many budget devices), topped out around 10.2 Gbps, falling short of what’s needed for 4K@60Hz. HDMI 2.0 opened the pipe to 18 Gbps, comfortably clearing the bar. Its presence is the non-negotiable minimum for any modern 4K-capable office machine.

  2. DisplayPort 1.4 (DP 1.4): This is the “pro” port, and its inclusion on an entry-level machine is the real story. DP 1.4 offers a massive bandwidth of 32.4 Gbps. This is vast overkill for a single 4K@60Hz display, and that’s the point. It gives the device capabilities far beyond its price point, such as:

    • Driving higher-refresh-rate monitors (e.g., 1440p @ 144Hz).
    • Potentially supporting 5K or even 8K displays at lower refresh rates.
    • Allowing for a dual 4K@60Hz setup (one via HDMI, one via DP) without the video controller even breaking a sweat.

The combination of these two ports on a single, compact device is a technological milestone. It signals a shift where multi-monitor 4K productivity is no longer a luxury feature but a standard expectation, even for the most budget-conscious segments.

The Engine: Intel N150 and the Modern SoC

Of course, the ports are just the “pipes.” The system still needs an “engine” capable of pushing that much data. This is the role of the Intel Processor N150 and its integrated Intel UHD Graphics.

The N150 is part of the “Twin Lake-N” family, a refresh of the “Alder Lake-N” architecture (which includes the popular N100). The marketing materials on the product page highlight a “+30% CPU, +40% GPU” performance boost over older chips. While these numbers are context-dependent, they miss the more important point: the video engine.

These modern SoCs integrate a highly advanced media and display controller directly onto the chip. This controller is specifically designed to handle multiple high-resolution video streams (like decoding 4K YouTube videos) in hardware, using almost no CPU power. More importantly, it has the internal bandwidth to feed the high-speed HDMI 2.0 and DP 1.4 ports.

This is why the N150’s “CPU speed” is almost the least interesting thing about it. Its true value in a device like this is its identity as a modern I/O hub that can process and output high-resolution video streams efficiently.

Balancing the System: Critical Trade-Offs

A dual-4K capable I/O is a great headline, but the rest of the system must be balanced to support it. Here, we see a series of deliberate, and very telling, engineering trade-offs.

RAM: 16GB DDR4 (The Single-Channel Compromise)
The KAMRUI E2 is equipped with 16GB of DDR4 RAM, a generous capacity for multitasking across two 4K screens. However, the specifications note it uses a single SO-DIMM slot. This means the memory runs in a single-channel configuration.

  • What this means: The CPU has only one “lane” to access the memory, effectively halving the theoretical memory bandwidth compared to a dual-channel (two-stick) setup.
  • The Impact: This creates a significant bottleneck for the integrated graphics. While it won’t be noticeable when watching videos or moving windows (2D tasks), it would cripple any 3D gaming performance.
  • The Trade-Off: This is a classic cost-saving measure. It’s cheaper to implement one slot than two. The engineers have made a calculated bet: the user for this device cares more about RAM capacity (16GB is great for many browser tabs) than GPU bandwidth (they aren’t gaming).

Storage: 1TB SSD (The Right Priority)
The system includes a 1TB M.2 SSD. This is a smart choice, prioritizing fast boot times and ample storage. The M.2 slot’s support for both older SATA and modern NVMe PCIe 3.0 protocols is a key feature, offering a clear upgrade path to even faster storage.

An exploded-view or feature diagram of the KAMRUI Essenx E2, showing the fan, the single SO-DIMM RAM slot, and the M.2 2280 SSD slot.

Cooling: Active Fan (The Noise Trade-Off)
The N150 has a higher Thermal Design Power (TDP) than its N100 siblings, reportedly 15W. To manage this heat in a tiny chassis, the E2 includes a built-in fan. This is another critical trade-off. Unlike a fanless N100 device (which is silent but may throttle under load), this actively-cooled N150 can likely sustain its 3.6GHz boost clock for longer, providing better-sustained performance at the cost of acoustic noise.

Conclusion: The New Baseline for Productivity

The KAMRUI Essenx E2, when analyzed as a technological case study, is a perfect example of the new reality in computing. Its most impressive feature is not its CPU, but its I/O. The inclusion of HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4 on an entry-level machine is a statement: dual 4K@60Hz is now the baseline for productivity.

The system is a sharp, deliberate collection of trade-offs: * It invests heavily in high-bandwidth video ports (DP 1.4) and a modern video engine (in the N150). * It prioritizes RAM capacity (16GB) and storage speed (NVMe-ready M.2) for a responsive desktop experience. * It compromises on GPU bandwidth (single-channel RAM) and silence (active fan) to hit its low price point and maintain performance.

This tiny box represents a machine that is not a “gaming PC” or a “powerhouse,” but something far more practical: a highly capable, multi-monitor productivity station that, just a few years ago, would have been considered “high-end.”