The $500 Paper Tray: Deconstructing the Engineering of an Enterprise-Grade Feeder
Update on Nov. 9, 2025, 9:50 a.m.
In a high-volume office, the most frequent point of failure in the document workflow isn’t the printer’s software or its ink. It’s the paper tray. The constant “out of paper” beep, the cryptic “load letterhead” error, and the dreaded jam from using heavy cardstock are the true bottlenecks to productivity.
While home users see a paper tray as a simple plastic drawer, B2B (Business-to-Business) environments view it as a critical, modular component of an enterprise workflow. This is why a device listed as a “paper tray” can weigh over 60 pounds and cost over $500.
To understand this, we must deconstruct the myth of the “dumb” tray. An enterprise-grade feeder, like the Kyocera Mita PF-470, is not a passive box; it is an active, electro-mechanical machine.

Deconstructing the Engineering: Why 256 g/m² is the Real Spec
The “500-sheet capacity” of the PF-470 is a simple, high-level benefit. It reduces the number of refills. The true engineering, and the reason for its cost, lies in its media weight and media size specifications.
The Mechanical Challenge of Heavy Stock (up to 256 g/m²)
A standard consumer printer tray is a spring-loaded plate. It’s designed to push thin, 75 g/m² (20 lb) paper up into a simple “pickup roller.”
This design fails catastrophically with heavy, rigid 256 g/m² cardstock. The spring isn’t strong enough, and the simple roller can’t get enough friction to lift the sheet. An enterprise-grade feeder, by contrast, is a heavy-duty “pull” system:
1. Pickup Rollers: These are robust, often motorized, high-friction “tires” that grab the top sheet of the paper stack with significant force.
2. Separation Pads/Rollers: This is the most critical component. To prevent the pickup roller from grabbing two sheets (a “double feed”), a “separation pad” or a reverse-moving “retard roller” sits below it, creating a precise “pinch” point. This mechanism physically stops the second sheet from passing through.
This complex, motorized feed-and-separation system is what allows a machine like the PF-470 to reliably handle a massive range of media, from thin 60 g/m² paper to thick 256 g/m² cardstock, without jamming.

Deconstructing the Workflow: The A3 and Multi-Tray Solution
The second “pro” feature is media versatility. The PF-470 is designed to work with large Multi-Function Printers (MFPs) like the Kyocera FS-C8520MFP, which are already A3-capable.
So, why add an extra A3-capable tray? The answer is workflow automation.
Imagine an office that needs to print:
* Standard A4/Letter documents.
* A3-sized (11.7” x 16.5”) spreadsheets or architectural drafts.
* Letterhead on 120 g/m² specialty paper.
Without a modular tray, this is a manual, high-friction process. An employee must walk to the printer, pull out the main tray, swap the A4 paper for A3 paper, run the job, then swap it back.
The PF-470, as a modular addition, solves this. It functions as a dedicated “Tray 3” or “Tray 4.” An office can now permanently load A4 in Tray 1, Letterhead in Tray 2, and A3 in the PF-470. The printer’s job queue can now run complex jobs automatically, pulling from the correct tray on command without human intervention.
Deconstructing the “Cabinet”: Why It Weighs 62 Pounds
A 62.39-pound “paper tray” is not a tray; it is a paper feeder and cabinet. This component is designed to be the base of the printer. The main MFP, which can weigh over 100 pounds, sits directly on top of it.
The weight comes from a reinforced steel frame designed to:
1. Support the main printer without buckling.
2. Raise the printer to an ergonomic, floor-standing height.
3. House the complex, heavy-duty feed mechanism described above.
This is a piece of industrial furniture, not a simple accessory.
Deconstructing “Compatibility”: The Feeder as a “Smart” Device
A modern enterprise feeder is not a “dumb” box. It is an active electronic module that must “dock” with the main printer. When the PF-470 is attached to a compatible MFP like the M4132idn or M8130cidn, a series of electronic contacts and sensors “handshake” with the MFP’s firmware.
This “handshake” is critical. It tells the printer’s brain:
* “A new paper tray, ID PF-470, is now installed.”
* “Its current paper size setting is A3.”
* “Its current paper type setting is Heavy 3 (256 g/m²).”
* “The paper-level sensor indicates it is Full.”
This is what enables automatic tray selection. When a user on their PC sends a print job specified for “A3 Cardstock,” the printer’s driver knows exactly which tray to pull from. This seamless integration is the final piece that transforms a stack of paper drawers into a single, automated document workflow.

Conclusion: The Engineering of “Uptime”
The Kyocera Mita PF-470 is a case study in the hidden engineering of office productivity. It demonstrates that a “paper tray” is one of the most mechanically complex and critical components of an enterprise printing system.
Its $514 price and 62-pound weight are not for a simple “box.” They are for a robust, electro-mechanical feed system designed to handle heavy cardstock, an A3-sized paper path, and the electronic integration required for true “walk-away” workflow automation. It is an investment not in “paper storage,” but in printer uptime and the reduction of manual, high-friction labor.